9/11 PLUS FIVE

Monday, September 11, 2006, will be the five-year anniversary of the attacks. Which means, in journalistic terms, it is a Big Anniversary. One year was a Big Anniversary. Ten and 20 and 25 will be Big Anniversaries. Then at 40 and 50, we'll be searching for survivors of the immediate experience. By 75 it will be only a handful who remember it at all. By 100 it will be history.

Fine, we have a base 10 fixation from having 10 fingers, or whatever. The journalism juggernaut rolls on to its own reckless gravity.

But Sept. 11 does not fit into this. The cycle of Big Anniversaries is false to its reality. This year won't feel like a Big Anniversary of Sept. 11 to me.

Because the "Tuesday" is as much a part of 9-11 as the date or the month. It was a workday. The people who died almost entirely died at their jobs, or commuting on work-related matters. And every workday is different, both in the grand sense -- Tuesday has a different psyche than Monday or Thursday -- and in the small sense of personal rituals and rhythms.

Tuesday is the day I go up on the parking garage roof after work with a couple of buddies and drink a few beers and hash things out out of sight of the owners. What I routinely do on Tuesday is not what I do on Monday. It likely so for you. It was so for most of those who died.

Some Tuesday peculiarity in the week's schedule -- a child's recurring morning piano lesson or a regular sales team meeting -- might have put someone in Death's path that day, or pulled someone else from it.

On one level, the terror attack was a convergence of schedules: Airline tables of weekday business flight hops from city to city, traders on their phones to clients with deadlines, Windows on the World restaurant workers shifting from breakfast to lunch menus.

Based on our calendar, a returning date falls on the same day of the week usually every six years (seven days in a week, but one leap year every four years means a skipped day). Next year, when Sept. 11 again falls on a Tuesday for the first time, will feel much closer to a connected anniversary.

INDEX - AUTHOR


Online Work

The SCIOLIST

ONLINE ETYMOLOGY DICTIONARY

SLAVERY in the NORTH

CIVIL WAR and AFTER

Some Sites

Nat Hentoff
Today's Front Pages
Watching America
N.Y. Observer
Democratiya
The Economist
Hoover Institution
New Perspectives
Parameters
WikiSky
Deceits of "Fahrenheit 9/11"
"The Media and the Military"
"Power and Weakness"
The Museum of Hoaxes
Zombie Hall of Shame
Spirit of America
Black Heritage Riders
Jill Sobule
Digital Medievalist
Northvegr
ShanMonster
Strange Fortune Cookie Fortunes
"Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds"
Urban Legends Reference Page
Anguish Languish
Engrish.com
Devil's Dictionary
Kissthisguy.com
"Gadsby"
Movie Mistakes
"Flatland"

Language

Unlikely phrases from real phrasebooks
Lost in Translation
English Online
Alphabet Evolution
Chinese Etymology
"The King's English"
A list of Proto-Indo-European Roots
Introduction to Proto-Indo-European
Lexilogos
"Svenska Akademiens Ordbok"
Johnson's Dictionary
"as Deutsche Wörterbuch von Jacob und Wilhelm Grimm"
Etymology of First Names
History of English Language
Word Spy
French Etymology
Old English Library
Sumerian Language Page

Joe Blogs

Ali Eteraz
Ambivablog
American Future
another lucky b*stard living in tuscany
Benzene 4
The Beiderbecke Affair
Candide's Notebook
Dennis the Peasant
Eve-Tushnet
The Glittering Eye
Irish Elk
Lily Blooming
Mark Daniels
Michael J. Totten
Michael Yon
Neurotic Iraqi Wife
Op-For
Pharyngula
Postmodern Conservative
Rhetorica
The Sandbox
Simply Skimming
Three Rounds Brisk
Tigerhawk
Too Sense
The Volokh Conspiracy
Winds of Change
ZenPundit


© September 11, 2006 Douglas Harper Moe: "Say, what's a good word for scrutiny?" Shemp: "uh ... SCRUTINY!"